Abstract. The globalization as a phenomenon affects to various spheres of life in modern society. At the same time the blurring of distinction often takes place in the thrall of instruments of “soft power”. American political scientist Joseph S. Nye included language and culture among them. They allow getting the desired result on the basis of the voluntary participation, forming a system of life values and norms of behavior through images and artifacts. One of the most effective sources of cultural influence is a literature. Attractive worlds are created by the word. The ideological orientations transmittable by the book may have an impact not only on the representations and actions of an individual or a social group, but also on the way of life of the society, or the development and history of the state. The authors of popular books are influencers that shape public opinion. They are able to affect on the behavior of the general public. Which writer today influences the formation of the views of modern youth? What books do they read? Who of contemporary and historical authors can be “regent of dreams” of Russian students? How far does the national literature give way to European, American and other conveyors of artistic images and meanings? The answers to these and others questions were received in our study whose purpose was to research the system of values and stereotypes, the communication behavior and models of Russian youth. In December 2016, we conducted a survey of 170 students of a various degrees of higher education studying at the Institute of World Economy and Business of the Faculty of Economics of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (IWEB RUDN University). We invited them to answer anonymously the questions of the survey, which consists the several informative modules, including describing the formal demographic and behavioral characteristics of respondents. The results of the study allow us to conclude that the part of the Russian students knows the world and Russian literature quite well in spite of the common opinion about the low level of Russian school education and the disinterest in books.
Keywords: intercultural communication, soft power, survey, Russian studentship
Anna V. Glagoleva1, Evgeniya A. Kuznetsova2, Yulia N. Zemskaya3
1, 2, 3Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
ORCID id: 0000-0001-8288-8047
ORCID id: 0000-0003-1180-0057
Chernenko, E. 2013. From the position of “soft power”. Kommersant 6 (5037). URL: https://www.kommersant.ru/ doc/2105575 [Accessed March 12, 2020]. Fan, Y. 2008. Soft power: the power of attraction or confusion. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan Т. 2, № 4: 147-158. Gallarotti, G. 2010. The Power Curse: Influence and Illusion in World Politics, Boulder. Lynne Rienner Press, 207 pp. Mattern, J.B. 2007. Why Soft Power Is Not So Soft. In: Power in World Politics. Felix Berenskoetter, M. J. Williams, eds. Routledge, 328 pp. McClory, J. 2018. The Soft Power 30: A Global Ranking of Soft Power. Portland. URL: https://softpower30.com/wp-content/ uploads/2018/07/The-Soft-Power-30-Report-2018.pdf [Accessed July 18, 2018]. Nye, J.S. 2012. China’s Soft Power Deficit To catch up, its politics must unleash the many talents of its civil society. The Wall Street Journal. URL: https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702 304451104577389923098678842 [Accessed March 5, 2020]. Nye, J.S. 1990. Soft Power. Foreign Policy, v. 80, n. 153. URL: https://ru.scribd.com/document/355658823/Soft-Power-NyeForeign-Policy-1990 [Accessed March 5, 2020]. Gates, R.M. 2007. Secretary of Defense. Landon Lecture (Kansas State University). Manhattan, Kansas. URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20100801065608/http://www.defens e.gov/speeches/speech.aspx?speechid=1199 [Accessed March 6, 2020].