- The authors:
Nataliia L. Sokolova - Pages: 546-556
- Section: SELECTED TOPICS IN GENERAL AND SPECIFIC LINGUISTICS IN SYNCHRONIC AND DIACHRONIC PERSPECTIVE
- URL: http://science-ifl.rudn.ru/10784-2021-546-556/
- DOI:
10.22363/10784-2021-546-556
Abstract. The article deals with some questions concerning English speech etiquette. It is devoted to the problem of its structural features and functioning. The dual nature of the units of speech etiquette – their belonging to both speech and language – happens to be the crucial factor in identifying their structural peculiarities and the sphere of their functioning.
Another area that calls for special attention is the approach to speech etiquette and units of speech etiquette from the point of view of the theory of speech acts. The units of speech etiquette analysis by method of the theory of speech acts seems to be very rewarding especially at the levels of psycho- and sociolinguistics.
Keywords: speech etiquette, speech etiquette units, subject group, theory of speech acts, communication, the addresser, the addressee, the illocution, the locution, the perlocution, metacommunication, sociolinguistics, psycholinguistics, intralinguistics
Nataliia L. Sokolova
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Moscow, Russia
e-mail: sokolova-nl@rudn.ru ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0667-5098
Austin J.L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford University Press, Amen House, London, 167 pp.
Belyaeva E. I. 1985. The principle of politeness in speech communication (ways of formalizing Declarative statements in English colloquial speech). Foreign Languages at School (2): 12-16. Belyaeva E.I. 1987. Modality and pragmatic aspects of directive speech acts in modern English. Dissertation of the doctor of philological sciences. Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Institute of Linguistics, Moscow, 459 pp.
Benveniste E. 1974. General linguistics. Progress, Moscow, 448 pp. Bereza L.P. 1985. Communicative and pragmatic features of the English text of informational and descriptive type. Dissertation of the candidate of philological sciences. Kiev State University named after T.G. Shevchenko, Kiev, 210 pp.
Buzarov V.V. 2001. The circulation of dialogic speech, or the interaction of the speaker’s grammar and the listener’s grammar. Stavropol State University, Stavropol, 167 pp.
Chaptykova A.A. 1987. Pragmatic characteristics of metacommunicative utterances in English colloquial speech. In: Structure and semantics of sentences and text in Germanic languages. LGPI named after A.I. Herzen, Leningrad, p. 130-136.
Chkhetiani T. D. 1987. Linguistic Aspects of Phatic Metacommunication. Dis. Cand. philol. sciences. Kiev State Pedagogical Institute in foreign languages, Kiev, 203 pp.
Demyankov V.Z. 1979. Interpretation of the text and the stratagem of behavior. In: Semantics of linguistic units and text (linguistic and psycholinguistic studies). Institute of Linguistics of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Moscow, p.109-116.
Demyankov V.Z. 1984. On the formalization of the pragmatic properties of language. In: Linguistic activity in the aspect of linguistic pragmatics. INION of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Moscow, p.197–222.
Dorodnykh A.I. 1987. Grammar of speech communication. Publishing house of Kharkov University, Kharkov, 109 pp.
Doroshenko A.V. 1985. Incentive speech acts and their interpretation in the text. Dissertation of the candidate of philological sciences. Moscow, 206 p.
Drazdauskene M-L. 1969. Is it possible to objectively single out speech in the contact-establishing function? Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 10. Philology. (6): 80-85.
Drazdauskene M-L. 1970. Contact-fixing function of speech. Dissertation of the candidate of philological sciences. Moscow State Pedagogical Institute of Foreign Languages, Moscow, 216 pp. Drazdauskene M-L. 1974. Lexical features of speech in the contact- establishing function. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 10. Philology. (5): 20-29.
Gadjiyeva K.E. 1988. Linguistic Aspect of Speech Etiquette of Russian and Azerbaijani Speakers. Dissertation of the candidate of philological sciences. Azerbaijan Pedagogical Institute of Russian Language and Literature named after M.F. Akhundov, Baku, 175 pp.
Gak V.G. 1982. Pragmatics, Usus and Speech Grammar. Foreign Languages at School 5: 11-17.
Greenbaum S. 1996. The Oxford English Grammar. Oxford University Press, London, N.Y., 652 pp.
Gventsadze M.A. 1986. Communicative Linguistics and Typology of Text. Publishing house of Tbilisi University, Tbilisi, 315 pp.
Kiseleva L.A. 1978. Questions on the theory of speech influence. Monograph. Leningrad State University, Leningrad, 160 pp.
Malyuga E., Litvinov A. & Panicheva E. 2016. Methods of effective teaching written communication. In: 8th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (EDULEARN), p.1967- 1970.
Marinchak V.A. 1978. The pragmatic aspect of the information sign, text. In: Functional Speech Styles in Synchronous and Diachronic Aspects: Intercollegiate Collection of Scientific Papers. Perm University, Perm, p. 128-135.
Mednikova E.M. 1974. The pragmatic aspect of the text. In: Linguistics of the text: Materials of the scientific conference, Part 1.
Moscow, 230 pp.
Melville Yu.K. 1968. Charles Pierce and Pragmatism. Publishing house of Moscow University, Moscow, 503 pp.
Nikitin M.V. 2009. Foundations of the linguistic theory of meaning. Librokom, Moscow, 168 pp.
Novak E. 1984. Russian speech etiquette from the point of view of the communicative behavior of Poles. Dissertation of the candidate of philological sciences. Pushkin State Russian Language Institute, Moscow, 1984, 174 pp.
Ozhegov S.I. 1990. Dictionary of the Russian Language. Edition 22. Russian language, Moscow, 921 pp. -578
Pocheptsov G.G. 1975. The Pragmatic Aspect of Sentence Study: Towards Building a Theory of Pragmatic Syntax. Foreign Languages at School (6): 15-26.
Pocheptsov G.G. 1980. Pragmatics of the text. In: Communicative- pragmatic and semantic functions of speech unity. KSU, Kalinin, p. 5-10.
Maurice Thorez Moscow State Pedagogical Institute of Foreign Languages,Pocheptsov G.G. 1981. Phatic Metacommunication. In: Semantics and pragmatics of syntactic unity. KSU, Kalinin, p. 52-59.
Pocheptsov O.G. 1986. Fundamentals of Pragmatic Sentence Descriptions. Vishcha school, Kiev, 116 pp.
Radyuk A.V. & Nazlukhanyan S.A. 2018. Phraseological units in the context of democratization of business communication. Issues of applied linguistics 2 (30): 47-56.
Rudnitskaya I.A. 1984. Pragmatic functions of one-phrase text in French (on the material of the headlines of the newspaper “L’Humanite”). Dissertation of the candidate of philological sciences. Maurice Thorez Moscow State Pedagogical Institute of Foreign Languages, Moscow, 189 pp.
Ryzhova L.P. 1981. Communicative functions of treatment. In: Semantics and pragmatics of syntactic unity. KSU, Kalinin, p. 60-85. Ryzhova L.P. 1982. Appeal as a component of the communicative act. Dissertation of the candidate of philological sciences. KSU, Kalinin, 148 pp.
Searle J.R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 203 pp. URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Accessed March 10, 2021].
Shelinger T. N. 1986. Unconventionally Allocated Communicative Units in Modern English. Dis. Cand. Philol. Sciences. Leningrad State University, Leingrad, 215 pp.
Shevchenko O. L. 1985. Means of Indirect Expression of Incentive in Modern English. Dis. Cand. philol. sciences. Kiev. Kiev State Ped. Institute of Foreign Languages, 185 pp.
Shilenko R.V. 1988. Regulation of equilibrium interpersonal relations in the communicative space. In: Linguistic communication: processes and units. KSU, Kalinin, p. 117-123.
Sidorova T.V. 1986. Communicative and semantic characteristics of units of speech etiquette (English 16-18 centuries). Dis. Cand. philol. sciences, Leningrad State University, Leningrad, 205 pp.
Stepanov Yu.S. 1981. In search of pragmatics (the problem of the subject). News of the USSR Academy of Sciences. Series of literature and language. 4 (40): 325-332.
Susov I.P. 1985. Language Communication and Linguistics. In: Pragmatic and Semantic Aspects of Syntax. Interuniversity collection. Publishing house of KSU, Kalinin, p. 3-12.
Tsyura S.V. 1994. Communicative-semantic features of statements- apologies. Abstract of thesis. dis. Cand. philol. sciences. Kiev Taras Shevchenko University, Kiev, 24 pp.
Vannikov Yu.V. 1979. Functional-pragmatic classification and types of text adequacy. In: Semantics of linguistic units and text (linguistic and psycholinguistic studies). Institute of Linguistics, Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Moscow, 175 pp.
Verschueren J. 1980. On Speech Act Verbs: Pragmatics and Beyond. , Amsterdam, 83 pp. URL:
[Accessed March 10, 2021].
Wierzbicka A. 1985. Speech acts. In: New in foreign linguistics:
collection of articles. Issue 16. Linguistic Pragmatics, p. 251-275.
John Benjamins Publishing Company
https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.i.4