COMMUNICATIVE STRATEGIES OF CREATING POSITIVE GROUP EVALUATION IN OPPRESSED SOCIAL GROUPS: THE CASE OF A FEMINIST ESSAY

Download PDF

Abstract. This study aims to investigate communicative strategies and tactics used in early intersectional feminist discourse in the USA in a situation of intergroup conflict related to gender and racial discrimination. The methods used by the researcher are linguistic description, context analysis, and pragmatic analysis. The paper looks into linguistic and sociological approaches to social categorization and the “Us — Them” dichotomy and describes the way this dichotomy is realized in the discourse of discriminated social groups, which often tend to attach positive evaluation to “them” (the more prestigious, dominant outgroup) and negative evaluation to “us” (the less prestigious, oppressed ingroup). Using G. Anzaldúa’s essay “Speaking in Tongues. A Letter to Third World Women Writers” (Anzaldúa G., 1981) as an example, this study identifies two main communicative strategies used in early intersectional feminist discourse: the strategy of delineating “us” and “them” and the strategy of reevaluation. It also identifies several communicative tactics implementing these strategies, describes the linguistic means used for each of the tactics, and analyzes their pragmatic potential. The study shows that the main communicative goal organizing the different strategies and tactics has to do with changing the way the discriminated group perceives and evaluates itself. Particular attention is given to the communicative tactic of access control, used by the author to address Spanish readers whose command of English is limited, while simultaneously trying to exclude readers who do not speak Spanish. This tactic includes two types of code switching: switching between different languages (English and Spanish) and between two genres (essay and personal letter, the essay being the predominant genre of the two). Another important tactic used by the author is rhetoric, which includes the use of various stylistic devices to influence the reader emotionally and aesthetically. The main stylistic devices identified in the essay include metaphors, allusions, rhetorical questions, and syntactic parallelism. It is demonstrated that intersectional feminist media may serve as a platform for oppressed groups to reaffirm their positive group identity and subvert negative social stereotypes.

Keywords: communicative strategies, communicative tactics, feminist discourse, discrimination, the “Us — Them” dichotomy

Dina Shchekina

The Saint Petersburg State University Saint Petersburg, Russia e-mail: d.shchekina@gmail.com

Anzaldúa G. Speaking in Tongues. 1981. A Letter to Third World Women Writers. In: Anzaldúa G., Moraga Ch. (Eds.) This Bridge Called My Back. Writings by Radical Women of Color. KITCHEN TABLE: Women of Color Press, New York, pp. 165–174.

Cameron D. 1992. Feminism and Linguistic Theory. Macmillan, London, 247 pp.
Cherniavskaya V. E. 2006. Discourse of power and power of discourse: linguistic persuasion issues. Flinta: Nauka, Moscow, 136 pp.

Chilton P. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse. Theory and Practice. Routledge, London, 226 pp.
Crenshaw K. 1989. Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum 1 (8): 139–167.

Dijk, Т. А. van. 2013. Discourse and power: Representation of dominance in language and communication. «LIBROKOM» bookhouse, Moscow, 344 pp.
Emel’ianova O. V. 2012. The «us — them» semiotic universal in the linguistic worldview. Human language. Humans in language. Joint monograph. SPbGU publishing house, Saint Petersburg, р. 43–69. Issers O. S. 2008. Communicative strategies and tactics in Russian speech. 5th edition. LKI publishing house, Moscow, 288 pp.

Klushina N. I. 2012. Power, mass media and society (strategies and tactics of influencing public opinion). In: G. Ia. Solganik (Ed.) The language of mass media and politics. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Journalism. MSU publishing house, Moscow, p. 262–283.

Krasnykh V. V. 2003. Welcomed among strangers: myth or reality? Gnozis publishing house, Moscow, 375 pp.

Lazar M. M. 2018. Feminist critical discourse analysis. In: Flowerdew J., Richardson J. E. (Eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies. Routledge, New York, p. 372–387.

Pen’kovskii A. B. 2004. On the semantic category of «otherness» in the Russian language. In: Essays on Russian semantics. Languages of Slavic culture, «Studia philologica», Moscow, p. 6–27.

Tajfel H., Turner J. C. 2004. The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. In: Jost J. T., Sidanius J. (Eds.), Key readings in social psychology. Political psychology: Key readings. Psychology Press, p. 276–293.

Zdravomyslova E. A., Temkina A. A. 2015. 12 lectures on gender sociology. European university publishing house, Saint Petersburg, 768 pp.